User talk:SIbuff

Hello, SIbuff! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kingturtle (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		A barnstar for a relatively new, constructive editor! Welcome. Outriggr (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I noticed that your additions to articles use essentially the wording of the sources you cited. This is a problem. I am referring to Thomas Adams (chewing gum maker) and Alfred Thompson Bricher [1]. See WP:plagiarism. Can you rewrite these articles/sections in your own words? I'll give you a few days... otherwise I'm pretty much forced to remove the material. Thanks, Outriggr (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kenneth Mitchell (politician)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kenneth Mitchell (politician). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Mitchell (politician). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SCARED! (Urban Explorers)

A tag has been placed on SCARED! (Urban Explorers) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Staten Island category?

Greetings! I see you added Category:People from Staten Island to a number of articles, including Lady Gaga and Madonna (entertainer). Staten Island is not mentioned in Gaga's article, so I've removed it. What's the source you're using for adding those categories?

They were listed on List of people from Staten Island.

Not much in the area of citations on the page.

NY 439A

Please read Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects#When to categorize a redirect, particularly bullet point 1 under "Redirects whose target title is incompatible with the category". The former numbered state highway was New York State Route 439A, not Victory Boulevard; thus, NY 439A is in the category and Victory Boulevard is not. This is the current practice used across WP:NYSR and by most of WP:USRD. If you disagree with this practice, please discuss it in those venues. Thanks. – T M F 09:56, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New York Tattoo Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New York Tattoo Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arnaldo Ferraro

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arnaldo Ferraro, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ferraroforgopchair.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the tag because nothing is copied from that website. SIbuff.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Stanley M. Isaacs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Housing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of categories

Hi - I just wanted to let you know that I went thru the large assortment of categories that you added to the Spanish Camp article a while back, and I'm afraid I found it necessary to remove about half of them. (The good news is that you did add a nice bunch of valid categories!) For future reference, please bear in mind that "people categories" are basically reserved for people, and should not be used for other things, like places or organizations, etc. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Cgingold. I should have been more careful when I added categories for that page. Thanks! And regards, SIbuff.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Michael R. Long, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond Hill High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Oakley

Hello. I've removed the Category:People from Staten Island from Annie's article; there is no mention of Staten Island in it, & she was born in Ohio, some miles from Staten Island. If there is a good reason to have that category there, please feel free to revert me or start a discussion on the talk page. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 06:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, i see on checking the history, i reverted you only a couple of minutes after you added it; i didn't realise that at the time, & don't intend mine action to seem unfriendly; sorry about the speed of that! Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 06:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Midshipman. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nose-wiping

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nose-wiping, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1, I intended for this to be a seriously article but do admit that I need better references for some of the material. Sincerely, SIbuff.

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Leather glove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fingerprints (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for point that out DPL bot (talk). I will correct that. Welcome, SIbuff.

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crime preparation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Conspiracy, Vault, Lock pick, Crow bar and Fingerprints

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perp walk article in xlinks

Thanks for adding that to the article. Wow ... 152 pages, almost 550 footnotes, some of them practically articles in and of themselves. It'll make a great source when I get around to working on the article again. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Daniel Case! Good luck with all, SIbuff!

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carl Lesch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to St. Peter's Church, Hello Dolly, Annie Get Your Gun and On The Town

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Janele Hyer-Spencer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Hart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anonymity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fingerprints (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bricktown Centre at Charleston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of leather gloves in fiction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of leather gloves in fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of leather gloves in fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 04:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of leather gloves in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Napier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disfigurement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Napier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anti-mask laws may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[[Category:Face]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heist (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fingerprints (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nice start at Slashing (crime). Bearian (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A&P Warehouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marisol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fingerprint

Sorry, that was too promotional so I've reverted you. Dougweller (talk) 09:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Matthew Buono

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Matthew Buono, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/aliceaustenpark/highlights/10800, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Matthew Buono and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Matthew Buono, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Matthew Buono with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Matthew Buono. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Matthew Buono saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Deor (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, SIbuff. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCI accepted. No user talk edits in two years despite continued editing turns this into a block:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Given your history, you need to give an assurance that you (1) understand the copyright policy, (2) will help with identifying any issues you have caused at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/SIbuff and (3) will be responsive to others' concerns before you are allowed to continue editing. To do so, use the unblocking procedure mentioned above. MER-C 04:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SIbuff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here= I believe that my years of good editing should be take into account to prove that my numerous good edits outweigh the mistakes listed above. Thank you SIbuff

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SIbuff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here= I apologize for contributing information that too closely resembles content posted in or by other sources. I would like to have my privileges reinstated on Wikipedia so that I can continue to expand the information on here. I promise to do a better job at policing my own work once I am reinstated. Thank you SIbuff

Decline reason:

I think you need to go into more detail about copyright, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing. Also, you need to provide assurances that you will be more responsive to concerns. PhilKnight (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of The Fresh Grocer

Hello SIbuff,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Fresh Grocer for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bricktown Center at Charleston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bricktown Center at Charleston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bricktown Center at Charleston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Martinez (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Martinez (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Martinez (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Farrell (priest)

The article Joseph Farrell (priest) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability demonstrated with secondary (non-Church) sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 14:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slashing (crime)

The article Slashing (crime) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No legal source given (nor one seems to exist) for "slashing" as a crime in its own right in any legal system. Given this is a page of overtly legal nature, the non-existence of "slashing" as a crime specifically disqualifies this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.EuanHolewicz432 (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]